The details of option 4 are presented below.
Cut-fill maps have been created at a 1/10th foot drop per 100 feet with a cut-fill ratio of 1.3. The cut fill values are outlined in the following table. Piping estimations are approximate, but additional piping may be needed, though the total amount probably will not make much of a difference from the estimations presented here.
The cut fill map for option 4 is given below.
The details of option 3 are presented below.
Cut-fill maps have been created at a 1/10th foot drop per 100 feet with a cut-fill ratio of 1.3. The cut fill values are outlined in the following table. Piping estimations are approximate, but additional piping may be needed, though the total amount probably will not make much of a difference from the estimations presented here.
The cut fill map for option 3 is given below.
The details of option 2 are presented below.
In this option water flow is modified to go from South to North on the North end of the field and from North to South on the South end. Using surface design software in concert with GIS allows for the evaluation of various scenarios in a similar way.
The cut fill map for option 2 is given below.
The details of option 1 are presented below.
Cut-fill maps have been created at a 1/10th foot drop per 100 feet with a cut-fill ratio of 1.3.
The cut fill map for option 1 is given below.
This blog and all its content is sponsored by RMCI Inc. General Contractors. 
